tm logo
SMARTLENS
Dead/Abandoned
ABANDONED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL

after ex parte appeal

on 11 Apr 2002

Last Applicant/ Owned by

6219 De Soto Avenue

Woodland Hills

CA

913672602

Serial Number

76067903 filed on 12th Jun 2000

Registration Number

N/A

Correspondent Address

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S. TARLTON

425 MARKET ST

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482

Filing Basis

1. intent to use

2. use application currently

Disclaimer

NO DATA

SMARTLENS

LENS ASSEMBLY, NAMELY, AN ELECTRONIC DISPLAY FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC CAMERAS COMPRISED OF A SENSOR TO BE AFFIXED TO A CAMERA LENS AND A DISPLAY SCREEN FOR PROVIDING REAL-TIME VISUAL AND ELECTRONIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE MECHANICAL AND OPTICAL STATE OF CAMERA LENS SETTINGS, NAMELY, THE FOCAL LENGTH, FOCUS DISTANCE AND DEPTH OF FIELD

Classification Information


Class [009]
Computer & Software Products & Electrical & Scientific Products


LENS ASSEMBLY, NAMELY, AN ELECTRONIC DISPLAY FOR PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CINEMATOGRAPHIC CAMERAS COMPRISED OF A SENSOR TO BE AFFIXED TO A CAMERA LENS AND A DISPLAY SCREEN FOR PROVIDING REAL-TIME VISUAL AND ELECTRONIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE MECHANICAL AND OPTICAL STATE OF CAMERA LENS SETTINGS, NAMELY, THE FOCAL LENGTH, FOCUS DISTANCE AND DEPTH OF FIELD


First Use Date in General

30th Jun 2000

First Use Date in Commerce

30th Jun 2000

Mark Details


Serial Number

No 76067903

Mark Type

No Service/Collective Mark

Attorney Docket Number

No 49096-6021

44D Filed

No

44D Current

No

44E filed

No

44E Current

No

66A Filed

No

66A Current

No

Current Basis

No

No Basis

No

Legal History


Show more

Status DateAction Taken
04th Dec 2002ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
21st Nov 2002EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
20th Nov 2002PAPER RECEIVED
21st Aug 2002ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
21st Aug 2002EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
11th Apr 2002ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
04th Apr 2002USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
12th Mar 2002EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
12th Mar 2002JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
05th Nov 2001CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE